|
onlinetopporn
Gość
|
|
 Wysłany: Pią 3:12, 30 Mar 2007 |
|
 |
|
|
|
A judge sharply limited the scope of the subpoena, which Google had fought on trade secret, not privacy, grounds.
To defend the nine-year-old Child Online Protection Act, government lawyers attacked software filters as burdensome and less effective, even though they have previously defended their use in public schools and libraries.
"It is not reasonable for the government to expect all parents to shoulder the burden to cut off every possible source of adult content for their children, rather than the government's addressing the problem at its source," a government attorney, Peter D. Keisler, argued in a post-trial brief.
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] bay!!! [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
|
|
|
